True or False: A person aggrieved by a decision, taxpayer, an officer, department, Board or Bureau of a municipality may all present to a court of record a verified petition stating that the decision of the Board of Adjustment is illegal in the whole or in part and specifying the grounds of illegality.

• A. True
• B. False
• C. Not Specified
• D. Sometimes

Answer: (A)

The idea being tested is how a Board of Adjustment decision can be reviewed in court. In this process, anyone who is aggrieved by the decision—such as a private individual—has standing to seek judicial review, and the statute also makes clear that a taxpayer and municipal parties like an officer, department, board, or bureau can pursue it. The review is done by filing a verified petition in a court of record, arguing that the Board’s decision is illegal either in whole or in part and stating the specific grounds of illegality. This framework gives broad access to challenge zoning actions, ensuring decisions stay within legal authority and follow proper procedures. So the statement is true because it aligns with the recognized avenue for challenging Board of Adjustment decisions.